5. The first and decisive legal victory
- Jun 7
- 2 min read
A chapter where the truth spoke louder than any accusation.

There are moments in life when a person understands, with absolute clarity, that justice exists.
And that when the facts speak for themselves, no pressure, no external interest and no strategy can change the truth.
This chapter marks the first major legal victory in this entire process:
the definitive dismissal, granted unanimously, based exclusively on the law and on the absence of elements demonstrating the commission of a crime.
After the first raid, which, from my perspective, would be incompatible with any modern State governed by the rule of law, an investigation began that never found a single element to support a criminal case.
Not one.
My company was in order.
My international contracts were in order.
My devices were certified.
My rights were documented.
Every report, every expert examination, every proceeding pointed in the same direction: there were no elements to support the existence of a crime.
For that reason, the judge’s decision was decisive:
definitive dismissal, applying the express provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which establishes that when there are no elements to support the accusation, the process must be closed irrevocably.
But the story did not end there.
The Public Prosecutor’s Office of Alto Paraná decided to appeal.
It presented no new evidence.
It presented no new arguments.
It simply appealed, attempting to keep alive a case with no foundation.
The Court reviewed everything once again:
the proceedings, the investigative steps, the reports, the legality of the procedure and the legal grounds of the judge’s decision.
And the response was clear, firm and categorical:
The sentence is confirmed.
The appeal is rejected.
The definitive dismissal becomes final.
A complete legal victory.
A decision supported by the law.
A recognition, for the second time, that there were no elements to support any crime.
That resolution marked an important point in my life:
the certainty that the truth does have strength.
The peace of knowing that an impartial court analyzed everything and confirmed what I had always known.
And the hope of still believing that Paraguayan justice can act with independence, rigor and courage when it must.
Today, I remember that day not as a personal triumph, but as proof that when the facts are clear, justice prevails.
It was the first major legal victory.
And it was also the reaffirmation that my work, my company and my professional path continue to respond to one simple principle:
doing things right, even when it comes at a cost.


